This
article is aimed to contribute to the ongoing concerns of Gambian about over
exploitation of our national resources notably the fisheries resources. On the
contrary, this is not in any way suggesting that we should not rise up to stop
unlawful acts detrimental to our coastline communities and the nation as a
whole nor is it in defence of any Chinese company purportedly responsible for
destruction of the natural resources. Rather it’s to present analysis of
national data on fisheries and fish resources as well as synopsis of interviews
conducted with some community members of Gunjur and Golden Lead Import &
Export Company Ltd factory workers.
The
Gambia artisanal sector creates employment for an estimated 200,000 Gambians,
70 % of which depends on the small pelagic species for livelihood. The small
pelagic species for which data is available include Sardinella Aurita - Yaboy
Maroc, Sardinella Maderensis-Yaboy Tass, Ethmalosa Fimbriata- Kobo comprising
the sardinella species; Decapterus spp,
Scomber japonicas and Trachurus trecae. The total production of this species
was estimated at 45,294mt in 2016 with sardinella species accounting for 88%.
Fish
by nature are migratory, small pelagic fish and other fish within the Gambian
waters traverse from Moroccan waters in the north to Congolese waters in the
south. Fish surveys have revealed that small pelagic resources are concentrated
in the waters of the North coastal countries (Morocco, Mauritania and Senegal)
in the Months of May, June and July and migrating to the south (The Gambia and
Southern Senegal) in July, August and September) and further south in September
and October. Therefore catches from Senegal is higher than that of The
Gambia.
To
what extend has the Gambian small pelagic fish resources been exploited?
The
potential pelagic fish stock in The Gambian waters ranged from a low of 101,000
to a high of 510,000mt from 1992-2011, averaging about 191,000. Catches/supply
of small pelagic on the other hand; ranged from 3,240mt to 45,294mt from 1981
to 2016 with an averaged production 19, 000mt indicating an unexploited
potential of about 172,000mt. Therefore licensing of fish processing factory to
that stimulate demand for small pelagic species is an option to maximize the
benefits of our fish resources for poverty alleviation and fisheries sector
development. Per capita fish consumption
is estimated at 25kg per person alone coastal areas and 9kg for inland
communities averaging 17kg per capita per person nationally giving rise to a domestic
demand for fish at 32,432mt (72% of supply)in 2016.
This
scenario is changed with registration of Golden Lead Import and Export Company
to process Sardinella species with an annual average demand of about 108,000mt
from 2015 onwards, pushing the total demand (domestic and industrial) for small
pelagic fish close the carrying capacity of 191,000mt per annum. This clearly
shows that Golden Lead has to outsource some 88% of their processing demand
from the sub region to operate at optimal level. The new Gambia and HE
President Adama Barrow government should do all within its powers to increase
domestic supply to be self-sufficient. I believe this is the untapped potential
of the fisheries sector that the new government under the leadership President
Barrow planned to exploit in the coming years as highlighted in several of his
speeches.
From
the above exposition, it is rational and strategic to allow fish processing
factory to stimulate demand whiles for fish in our case it happens to be Golden
Lead Company and Chinese. This is the best option and aligned with ANR policy
and GAIP for we cannot afford to increase supply first and think of what to do
with over supply; that situation would have been worse than the present
appalling environmental situation along the our coastlines being reported in
the social media and much more difficult to control.
What
caused the present seemingly national security threat?
A
review of the claims in the social seems to suggest that it is Golden Lead
Company that is registered to fish in our waters and dumping the excess all
over Gunjur and Kartong area. It should be noted that the company is yet to be
engaged in any fishing activity and has the data shows they is in fact
depending more (88% of supply) on the sub-region for their supply than the
Gambia and put to rest the over exploitation of our fish resources to rest.
Secondly, as can be gleaned from the pictures of trucks either dumping or
loaded with fish no rational business will register to fish in Gambian waters,
but land in Senegal, hire trucks to transport the fish to Gunjur when you can
go straight to your factor and reduce cost.
The
company has been operating since 2015 with minimal dumping with minimal
environmental pollution. The escalated environmental pollution causing people
to be sick in recently is reportedly caused by increase in the number of
registered fishing boating targeting to supply the factory due to a ban on
Senegalese fishing boat supplying fish processing factories in Mauritania over
the years. Others attribute the situation to overnight fishing whereby fish
caught earlier get rotten before landing. Considering that fish is being
brought by sea and land tons and tons got rotten and unacceptable to the
factory. Then question becomes who own this rotten fish being dumped? Is it the
people who brought the fish and have no further use of it dump or the factory
for failing to purchase all the fish brought and therefore should close
business?
My
take is that it’s a collective responsibility of the all stakeholders
particularly the beach management committee, the community and to some extent
the factory for being present and the government for allowing the factory. The
beach management committee is responsible of coordinating and registering boats
to land on their beach for a fee. The community for allowing illegal dumping in
their community knowing that the government designated dumping site is situated
in Brikama and seeing a truck dumping at a wrong site and the only thing you
can think of is to take a picture for social media complain what is difficult
to control are those dumping in the sea and being washed on the beach.
Mitigation measures suggested include: 1) grouping the boats and introducing
turns to reduce supply 2) Ban overnight fishing as in Senegal 3) boarder police
to stop all vehicles carrying fresh fish from entering the country 4) the navy
to monitoring illegal dumping in the sea.
To
conclude it be stated that the Chinese company establishment in the community
of Gunjur has benefited the community in terms of direct employment of youths
at the factory. The issue of how much they are being paid can better be
addressed at policy level by legislation minimum wage law rather than targeting
only the Chinese employers based on their reported character elsewhere. A far
more additional employment is created for those offloading the fish, earning
for this group ranged from D1, 000.00 to D4, 000.00 per day compare this with
the government integrated pay scale. Also the presence of the factory has increased
the earns for the beach management committee as they collect D3.00 from each
boat landed as well as petty vendors earning their livelihood from the beach
not possible before the establishment of the factory. Most importantly for the
country to increase employment in the fisheries sector both processing and
fresh fish exports have to increase talk less of improving the nutritional
status of the citizens. The social media claims though outrageous, have raised
important research topics for UTG student and environmental economist to show
the extent of economic losses due to environmental degradation compared
against gains as long has death is yet
to be reported. However, with available
information on the cause of the situation have no doubt that the situation can
be corrected without resorting to closure of the factory has the country needs
this type of heavy investment which compete less with what can be left entirely
for the citizens called FDI take a walk along Jimpex road and Kairaba avenue.
