The
criminal appeal case involving six appellants and the state resumed yesterday
before the Gambia Court of Appeal, presided over by Justice Adegoke, president
of the court of appeal, with Justice Awa Bah and Justice Edrissa Mb’ai as
members.
The
appellants are Lt. Col Sarjo Jarju, Captain Abdoulie Jobe, Captain Buba K.
Bojang, Lt. Amadou Sowe, Lt. Buba Sanneh
and Private Njie Modou.
It
would be recalled that the appellants were convicted and sentenced to life
imprisonment and death by a court martial on 30 March 2015 at the Fajara
Barracks for treason and allied offences.
The
appellants were charged with twelve counts of treason and allied offences
ranging from concealment of treason to offences relating to mutiny.
The
1st 5th and 6th appellants were sentenced to death, whilst the 2nd, 3rd and 4th
appellants were sentenced to life in prison.
When
the matter came up yesterday, lawyer L.S. Camara, defence counsel for the 4th
appellant, told the court that he was served with the substantive record of
proceedings yesterday morning by the DPP.
He
expressed gratitude for the state’s magnanimity in the compilation of the said
record of proceedings.
He
said the record is about 700 pages and, therefore, applied for leave to be
granted to him to enable him file additional grounds of appeal on behalf of his
client.
The
DPP, S.H. Barkum, objected to his application to file additional grounds of
appeal, noting that a lot of time has been spent in the name of compiling the
record of proceedings.
The
DPP pointed out that the state went the extra mile to assist in the compilation
of the said record, to ensure speedy hearing of the case.
He
said the appellant bears the burden of compiling the record and serving them on
the respondents and, therefore, urged the court to order briefs to be filed by
the parties as the records of proceedings are now ready.
The
DPP submitted that the defence asking for an adjournment to file more grounds
of appeal was not tenable.
He
reminded the court that in April 2016, the appellants applied to file more
grounds of appeal, and this was granted despite the objections raised by the
state.
Any
further adjournments at this stage would occasion unnecessary delay on the
proceedings, the DPP added, and urged the court to reject the defence’s
application to file additional grounds of appeal.
L.S.
Camara disagreed with the DPP, and said the record of proceedings emanated from
the court martial whose records were not readily and ordinarily available.
Counsel
said the matter is a criminal case, and the burden is on the state to prepare
the records in criminal matters and not the appellants.
That
being the case, preparation of records of proceedings are not paid for by the
appellants, who are incarcerated.
He
submitted that the DPP misconstrued the difference between notice of appeal,
and an application to file additional grounds of appeal.
He
urged the court to grant the application having regard to the circumstances of
the case, and the gravity of the punishment meted upon the appellants.
In
the court’s ruling, Justice Adegoke said it was proper to grant the defence
application, as he was only served yesterday morning with the records of
proceedings.
The
matter is a criminal case, and it is trite law and constitutionally imperative
to grant the application.
The
judge, therefore, refused the DPP’s application and ordered lawyer L.S. Camara
to file the additional grounds of appeal.
The
matter was then adjourned until 17 November 2016, for motion and ordering of
briefs of arguments.