WAES underscored that the 1997 Constitution of the The Gambia guarantees freedom of expression, including the independence of the media, under Sections 25 and 207. These provisions, it noted, not only protect the rights of journalists but also place a responsibility on the media to uphold public interest and hold authorities accountable.
“It is therefore troubling that the Gambian authorities, at such a crucial time in the nation’s history, would consider implementing measures that could restrict media operations,” the statement said. Instead, WAES urged the government to prioritise strengthening the media sector, protecting journalists, and ensuring the integrity of journalism through adequate support and resources.
The organisation warned that registration and accreditation systems have historically been used in some contexts as tools to control, silence, and limit the ability of the media to scrutinise those in power. Introducing such a mechanism now, it argued, raises serious concerns about possible attempts to stifle dissenting voices.
Standing in solidarity with journalists in The Gambia, WAES reaffirmed its unwavering support for the GPU’s position, describing the proposal as “deeply worrying.”
Acting President of WAES, Emmanuel K. Dogbevi, said media registration regimes should have no place in democratic societies.
“Such systems should not be tolerated in any democracy. Journalism is a vital tool for ensuring accountability and responsible governance. Any instrument that could be used to restrict press freedom must not be allowed,” he said.
He further called on the Gambian authorities to immediately abandon the proposal, warning that it risks weakening democracy by silencing critical and independent voices.
WAES concluded by emphasising that press freedom is not a privilege but a fundamental right, urging the government to ensure that journalists and media institutions are fully protected and empowered to carry out their duties without interference.
