Jan 18, 2010, 2:00 PM
In the Editorial, we made mention of three different cases which we believe represent needless wastes of resources.
To start with, it could be recalled that during the
President's recent Dialogue with the People Tour, Kanifing Municipal Council
(KMC) presented a cheque to Gamworks as their counterpart contribution towards
the construction of
However, a contract was last year awarded to Sinco Spa to the tune of D12, 504,500.76 (Twelve million, five hundred and four thousand, five hundred dalasis and seventy-six bututs) for the construction of the same Kayupa Road and the rehabilitation of the Brikama Car park in Banjul.
It is noteworthy that we raised three issues in our Editorial. The first one is how many contracts there are.The second question is that one of the contracts involves Brikama car park, but Brikama car park is left out in the other ones. So which of them is Sinco Spa handling and which one is Gamworks dealing with? And the third one is why the construction of the same road is given to two organisations?
Reacting to some of these concerns, Mr Omar Gaye, GAMWORKS
Technical Director, said that there was only one contract which was to do the
Brikama Car park in
On how much money was spent on the project for the road and the car park, he said that D12.5m was for both Kayupa road and the car park but only D8.7m went to the road and the balance was for the car park.
"The Kayupa road was a priority project for the KMC, so was also the car park but because the chunk of the money was not enough, we could only do a little. We cannot afford not to do the road because of the condition it was and we did it with the limited funds we had," Mr. Gaye noted.
According to the GAMWORKS Technical Director, the agency gave the contract to Sinco Spa to do both the car park and the road. This, he added, was done through a competitive process.
"GAMWORKS had a poverty alleviation and capacity building project which closed in December 2006. Through this project, we engaged all these Municipalities to implement projects for them and those projects are meant for poverty alleviation", he said in response to the suggestion that the funds should have been used for poverty alleviation purposes.
Regarding the amount spent on the Basse mini stadium, he said that the original amount for the project was D1.7m. This, he added, was terminated in 2002 and another contract of D3.601m was signed in 2007. The new contract, according to Mr. Gaye, was increased due to the rising prices of building materials.
Even after all that has been said in reaction to our Editorial, we believe that the questions raised remain sticking as the above make clear.