As The Gambia officially changed its diplomatic ties with Taiwan to China in March 2016, numerous observers moved swiftly to contextualize it as another moment of China increasing its influence in Africa. This was beyond a hunt for aid and infrastructural development. It was an idea, identity and long-term positioning strategic decision. Despite being a small state, The Gambia was not desperate, but rather a country that realized the strength of narratives in foreign policy making.
This shift can be explained through discursive institutionalism, a framework formed by Vivien Schmidt and Mark Blyth. According to the theory, ideas, and the ways leaders communicate policy ambitions, how they rationalize decisions, and the process of establishing of relationships are the main factors of political actions. In the case of The Gambia, the re-engagement with China was not discussed as a break of weakness, but as a re-strategic alignment which was based on good relations and mutual gain.
China has been described byThe Gambia’s former Foreign Minister Mamadou Tangara as being a reliable development partner. This kind of language was not just an indication of diplomatic favor, but it authorized the liaison in the minds of the people of Gambia and it placed the state as an independent actor in making its own decisions.
In the case of The Gambia, China is a source of inspiration and opportunity. The officials of Gambia usually stress the emergence of Beijing as the result of internal discipline, long-term planning and a blueprint of state-led development. These thoughts resonate in a nation that has had difficulty with infrastructural issues and decades of under-investment. The Gambian leaders were not just finding a way to acquire resources by embracing China but they were also borrowing the ideological blueprint that linked their dreams to a global south image of self-driven development.
China on its part, interpreted the re-established relationship as a figurative victory of its One China policy and a strategic strengthening of its expanding relationship with Africa. Its state capitalism model, which is propelled by state-owned enterprises investing in foreign countries, also created the room to form cooperation with smaller states that seek partners who do not demand many political conditions.
The gain to the Gambia was obvious. Physical manifestations of the partnership are roads, government buildings, and Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara International Conference Center. Unlike Western aid, these projects had fewer conditions attached to them, which enabled Gambian leaders to point at visible improvement. This is the same that thepolitical economist R. W. Carney refers to as the stabilization of state capitalism, the economic cooperation strengthens the domestic growth and diplomatic alignment.
Despite that, such a ties is not free from controversy. Gambians have lamented about the environmental degradation associated with Chinese firms, overfishing, increasing debt and preferential treatment that marginalize the locals. Regardless of this open criticism, the government still characterizes the partnership as that between equals with regard to respect and sovereignty. The officials maintain that China does not weaken the autonomy of the nations, which supports the notion, which grants the relationship its conceptual basis.
Collectively, these dynamics indicate that The Gambia-China relationship is not influenced by material interests only. It is somewhere between state capitalism, international political economy and the power of discourse. The foreign policy of the Gambia demonstrates how small states may use ideas not only resources to make their way through the global competition and to gain the agency.
The move of abandoning Taiwan was not just a diplomatic divorce act, but a strategized move to rebrand The Gambia in the world. It was an assertion that big ideas can allow small states to reconnect with their role in the world politics. The question as to whether this relationship will be sustained will rest on the question of whether the main concepts development, partnership and sovereignty will still resonate. The story of The Gambia is a lesson in a world that power is increasingly dependent on telling great narratives, and that maybe, power is not just about investments, but the person with the most persuasive narrative of the future.
Name: Ousman Corr
Program: MA Political Science Specializing in International Relations
Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia
Email: Ousman.Corr@uiii.aci.id
REFERENCE:
Alami, I., & Dixon, A. D. (2020). The strange geographies of the ‘new’state capitalism. Political Geography, 82, 102237.
Blyth, M. (2003). Structures do not come with an instruction sheet: Interests, ideas, and progress in political science. Perspectives on politics, 1(4), 695-706.
Blyth, M. (2013). Paradigms and paradox: The politics of economic ideas in two moments of crisis. Governance, 26(2), 197-215.
Bush, R. C. (2016). China’s Gambia gambit and what it means for Taiwan. Brookings Institution, Mar, 22.
Campbell, J. L. (1998). Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory and society, 27(3), 377-409.
Carney, R. W. (2015). The stabilizing state: State capitalism as a response to financial globalization in one-party regimes. Review of International Political Economy, 22(4), 838-873.
China's Diplomacy in the New Era News by, Z. Yating (2024). China-Gambia ties provide an example of South-South cooperation. https://en.chinadiplomacy.org.cn/2024-12/15/content_117608291.shtml
Conteh, F. (2020). The Gambia–China Relations and Its Strategies To Restrain The Western Influences InThe Gambia (Bachelor's thesis, Fisip UIN Jakarta).
Ministry Of Foreign Affairs, The Gambia. (2020). Foreign minister assures China of The Gambias support to multilateralism win-win cooperation. https://mofa.gov.gm/foreign-minister-assures-china-of-gambias-support-to-multilateralism-win-win-cooperation/#
Samba, O. (2021). The National Interest Of China In Their Economic Cooperation WithThe Gambia from 2016–2018 (Bachelor's thesis, Fisip UIN Jakarta).
Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 11(1), 303-326.
Sillah, B., & Jammeh, M. E. (2007). AERC scoping studies on China-Africa relations: The Gambia. AERC Scoping Studies on China-Africa Economic Relations.
XINHUANET, (2019). China-Gambia relations see rapid development on all fronts: Chinese FM. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/africa/2019-01/06/c_137723652.htm#:~:text=For%20his%20part%2C%20Tangara%20thanked,China%20in%20various%20international%20affairs.
