The President’s address reported a real GDP growth of 5.9 percent, inflation declining to 6.6 percent, and a projected revenue envelope of over D50 billion. Public debt was also placed at 68.8 percent of GDP figures the government says indicate macroeconomic stability.
But according to Faal, these indicators alone do not demonstrate improved welfare. He stressed that the key issue is whether such figures translate into job creation, income growth, and reduced cost of living; areas he said were not sufficiently addressed.
Faal further pointed to the absence of independent impact assessments for major government projects, arguing that without clear data linking public spending to poverty reduction and employment, it becomes difficult to measure real progress.
He also highlighted concerns over governance and accountability, citing repeated findings of financial irregularities by oversight institutions without corresponding enforcement or prosecutions. This, he warned, undermines public confidence and weakens institutional credibility.
On the economy, Faal drew attention to the country’s heavy reliance on remittances, which he said reached approximately $872 million, representing 34 percent of GDP. While acknowledging their importance, he questioned the lack of policies to channel these funds into long-term national development.
He further noted that the depreciation of the dalasi continues to impact the cost of living, particularly in an import-dependent economy like The Gambia.
While recognising some progress, including developments in transport and public sector reforms, Faal criticised the lack of full disclosure on issues such as ghost workers, including the scale of losses and actions taken against those responsible. He also raised concerns about increasing reliance on foreign private operators without clear strategies to strengthen local participation.
Faal concluded that after nearly a decade in office, the government must move beyond reporting activities to demonstrating measurable and widely felt results.
“The issue is not whether the government has acted,” he said, “but whether it has proven the impact of its actions.”
His remarks add to a growing national conversation on governance, accountability, and whether official progress reflects everyday realities.
Read Other Articles In Headlines
