However, it has been brought to our attention that the facts presented in the story were claims advanced by the plaintiffs and not a court’s ruling. We therefore sincerely apologise to both parties involved in the suit and our general readership for any inconvenience the story might have caused.
Corrigendum
Nov 21, 2024, 9:58 AM
1 min read
Court case v27
In our yesterday’s publication, we inadvertently reported the article headlined: ‘Court orders reinstatement of former UTG lectures, awards damages of D5.2M’, as a court ruling.
Read Other Articles
Clerk defends proposed 2027 budget before FPAC
Oct 5, 2026
I will only align with politicians I can vouch for: Independent aspirant
Oct 1, 2026
42 communities abandon farming due to climate shocks: Report
Sep 24, 2026
We are all ageing: ASI calls for age-friendly Gambia
Oct 1, 2026
Barrow says religious leaders key to national peace, unity
Sep 28, 2026