• About The Point NewspaperLearn more about The Point Newspaper
  • Contact The PointContact The Point Newspaper
Install Flash Player to view this video.
Who Killed Deyda Hydara
News Gambia from The Point Newspaper
GAMBIA NEWS FOR FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY
  • Home
  • Headlines
  • National
  • Sports
  • Courts
  • Editorial
  • The BiteThe Bite News The Point Newspaper
  • For the RecordsFor the Records news on the Point Newspaper
  • About The PointInformation about me, and what I am all about.
  • Contact UsContact us for feedback and information
  • Sign In
Edit - Delete
Show Media ItemShow Media Item - In Modou Manga's Case

In Modou Manga's Case

africa » gambia
Monday, September 14, 2009

Prosecution Witnness Indisposed

The case involving Modou Manga could not proceed before the new Principal Magistrate, Joseph Ikpala of the Kanifing Magistrates' Court because the prosecution witness, who was to be further cross-examined by the Defence Counsel, was indisposed on 10th September 2009.

When the case was first called on 10th September 2009, the accused Modou Manga told the court that his Counsel, Edu Gomez, who was not present at the time, would later appear in court. The Clerk had confirmed to the court that the Defence Counsel had communicated to him that he would appear in court, requesting for a stand-down of the case. As a result, the case was stood down and later, the Defence Counsel arrived.

The case was again called and the Prosecuting Officer, Cadet Inspector Mballow informed the court that the prosecution witness was not present in court for him to be further cross-examined by the Defence Counsel. As he testified, he had fallen ill and went to the RVTH for treatment. He applied for an adjournment.

The Defence Counsel, Edu Gomez did not object to the application made by the Prosecutor and the case was adjourned to 23rd September for continuation.

The same prosecution witness testified in May 2008 against the accused, and at the end of his testimony, he was cross-examined by the Defence Counsel but did not finish the cross-examination.

The case was adjourned for the prosecution witness to be further cross-examined and when it resumed, the witness was no where to be found. The court was made to understand later that the witness had absconded.

But this time around, the witness had fallen ill, according to the Prosecutor.

Author: Dawda Faye
Edit - Delete
Html Script BoxHtml Script Box - Sponsored Links
Edit - Delete
Html Script BoxHtml Script Box - Ads by Google
Edit - Delete
Back and NextBack and Next - More
More
« Back
Next »
Edit - Delete
Media ActionsMedia Actions - Media Actions
Media Actions
Email to a friend
Edit - Delete
See AlsoSee Also - See Also
See Also
  • 1st prosecution witness testifies in house breaking case
  • 1st prosecution witness testifies in house breaking case
  • Justice Richards urges prosecution to adhere to international standards
HOME  ARCHIVE  ARTS AND CULTURE  BIBLICAL REFLECTION THE BITE  BOOK REVIEW  CHRISTIAN PANORAMA  COURTS   DALASI EXCHANGE RATE    EDITORIAL  FOR THE RECORD  HEADLINES  HEALTH  MUSLIM HANDS  NATIONAL NEWS  OPINION  SHE SHE SHE  SPORTS  YOUTH FORUM  
About the Point Newspaper
Contact Us

© Copyright The Point Newspaper. All rights reserved. 

Administered by Rhythm Ltd.

Website created with Lara by Geographical Media